he said so! He did not mention any criticism or endorsement, and Nāfiʿ ibn Yazīd only narrated from Jaʿfar ibn Rabīʿah from him as you see in this isnād, so perhaps he narrated from him directly in other than this ḥadīth. Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned in "al-Thiqāt" (2/189) his narration from him as well, saying: "ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Sāʾib ibn ʿUmayr al-Qārī, from the people of Medina, narrates from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib and ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Azhar, and Ibn Jurayj and Nāfiʿ ibn Yazīd narrated from him." And the rest of the men are trustworthy from the men of the two Shaykhs, so the isnād is good, and the ḥadīth is authentic due to its well-known supporting evidences, one of which was mentioned earlier as number (714).

- "Only three types of people plant: a man who has land, so he plants it; a man who is granted land, so he plants what he is granted; and a man who rents land with gold or silver." It was recorded by Abū Dāwūd (3400), al-Nasāʾī (2/149), Ibn Mājah (2449), and al-Ṭaḥāwī in "al-Mushkil" (3/284) through the route of Abū al-Aḥwaṣ, who narrated to us from Ṭāriq ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib from Rāfiʿ ibn Khadīj who said: "The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) forbade muḥāqalah and muzābanah, and said..." and he mentioned it. I say: This isnād is good; all its men are trustworthy, men of the two Shaykhs, and in the route of Ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān - who is al-Bajalī al-Aḥmasī - there is some discussion that does not harm, if Allāh wills. And the ḥadīth has many supporting evidences in "the two Ṣaḥīḥs" and others, and it is a clear proof of the permissibility of renting land for cultivation with the two currencies, contrary to some.

- "It suffices one of you in this world what is like the provision of a traveler." It was recorded by Abū Yaʿlá (4/1729-1730) and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (number -