in "al-Āthār" (1/107) from Shuʿbah, from Saʿd ibn Ibrāhīm, who said: I heard Nāfiʿ narrating from the wife of Ibn ʿUmar, from ʿĀʾishah, in a marfūʿ form. Aḥmad also reported it (6/55 and 98) from this route, except that he said "a person" instead of "the wife of Ibn ʿUmar." The men of its isnād are all trustworthy except for the wife of Ibn ʿUmar, whom I did not recognize, but the assumption about her is good. Moreover, Sufyān al-Thawrī omitted her from the isnād and made the ḥadīth from the musnad of her husband, Ibn ʿUmar. al-Ṭaḥāwī reported it through the route of Abū Ḥudhāyfah, narrated to us by Sufyān from Saʿd from Nāfiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar in a marfūʿ form, similar to it. And this isnād, its men are also trustworthy, the men of al-Bukhārī, except that he included Abū Ḥudhāyfah as a follower, and his name is Mūsá ibn Masʿūd al-Nahdī, and al-Thawrī is more reliable than Shuʿbah, except that the narrator from him is weak, as the ḥāfiẓ said: "Truthful but poor in memory." And when Abū Nuʿaym reported it in "al-Ḥilyah" (3/174) from his route, he indicated its weakness and preferred the first by saying: "Thus Abū Ḥudhāyfah narrated it from al-Thawrī from Saʿd, and it was narrated by Ghandar and others from Shuʿbah from Saʿd from Nāfiʿ from a person (originally Sinān!) from ʿĀʾishah ﵂ similarly." However, the ḥadīth has an origin from Ibn ʿUmar, as Ibn Saʿd said in "al-Ṭabaqāt" (3/430): Ismāʿīl ibn Masʿūd informed us, saying: ʿAbd Allāh ibn Idrīs informed us, saying: ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar informed us from Nāfiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar, who said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: and he mentioned it similarly. I say: And this isnād is authentic; its men are all trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs except for Ismāʿīl ibn Masʿūd, who is Abū Masʿūd al-Jaḥdarī al-Baṣrī, and he is trustworthy