and the narrator from him is Jundub ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-ʿAdwānī, who was also deemed trustworthy by al-ʿAjlī, number (182), thus the isnād is obscure. Yes, it was narrated by Ibn ʿAsākir (12/8/1) from Muʿādh ibn Asad (the scribe) of Ibn al-Mubārak, who informed us from Ibn al-Mubārak, from Ibn Lahīʿah, from Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥabīb, from Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Maʿāfirī, from Sufyān ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Thaqafī, from ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr with it. I said: This isnād is good; all its men are trustworthy from the men of "the Ṣaḥīḥ" except Ibn Lahīʿah, who is trustworthy and his ḥadīth is sound if narrated by one of the ʿAbādilah, among them ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak. This ḥadīth is from his narration as you see, and it is apparent that Ibn Lahīʿah had two isnāds for it, narrated by Ibn al-Mubārak, once with this and once with that, and thus the ḥadīth is authentic, and all praise is due to Allāh. And Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Maʿāfirī's name is ʿAbd Allāh ibn Yazīd al-Ḥublī al-Miṣrī.

- "Indeed, Allāh has withheld repentance from the innovator." It was recorded by Abū al-Shaykh in "Tārīkh Aṣbahān" (p. 259), al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ" (no. 4360), Abū Bakr al-Malḥamī in "Majlisayn min al-Amālī" (fol. 148/1-2), al-Harawī in "Dhamm al-Kalām" (6/101/1), al-Bayhaqī in "Shuʿab al-Īmān" (2/380/2), and Yūsuf ibn ʿAbd al-Hādī in "Jamʿ al-Juyūsh wa-al-Dasākir ʿalá Ibn ʿAsākir" (fol. 33/1) through various chains from Hārūn ibn Mūsá, who narrated to us from Abū Ḍamrah, from Ḥumayd, from Anas in a marfūʿ form. I said: This isnād is authentic; its men are trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs, except Hārūn ibn Mūsá, who is al-Farwī. Al-Nasāʾī, followed by al-Ḥāfiẓ in "al-Taqrīb," said: "There is no harm in him." Al-Haythamī said in "Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid" (10/189): "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ,' and its men are the men of 'the Ṣaḥīḥ' except Hārūn ibn Mūsá al-Farwī, and he is trustworthy."