"narrated by the authors of the Sunan," who are four well-known individuals, but it was only narrated by al-Nasāʾī and Ibn Mājah! 2- He mentioned (p. 18) a ḥadīth regarding the virtue of Ramaḍān, and said: "narrated by al-Nasāʾī," but this is falsely attributed to him, as he did not narrate it. It was actually narrated by al-Ṭabarānī as stated in "al-Targhīb" and "al-Majmaʿ" by al-Haythamī, who said: "it includes al-Faḍl ibn ʿĪsá al-Raqāshī, who is weak." 3- He mentioned (p. 50) the ḥadīth: "Relieve us with it, O Bilāl," and in the footnote, he cited its source as "Lisān al-ʿArab." This poor soul did not recognize a source for this ḥadīth other than this book, which is known not to be among the books of ḥadīth, but rather a linguistic work, while it is found in "Sunan Abī Dāwūd" and cited in books of the sunnah like "al-Mishkāt" (1253) and others! 4- He cited (p. 56) the report of Ubayy ibn Kaʿb regarding his prayer in Ramaḍān of twenty rakʿahs, and that he would not perform the qunūt except in the second half... and he quoted from "al-Mughnī" by Ibn Qudāmah: "narrated by Abū Dāwūd." I said it has an obvious defect, which is the disconnection between al-Ḥasan—who is al-Baṣrī—and ʿUmar, and with such, it is used as evidence against the Salafis who adhere to the sunnah in the Tarāwīḥ prayer as mentioned earlier, and he accuses them of every calamity as previously stated. 5- He mentioned (p. 78) the ḥadīth "My ummah will not agree upon an error," and in another narration