and the ḥadīth was mentioned by Ibn al-Jawzī in "al-Mawḍūʿāt" (p. 579 of "al-Laʾālīʾ" - Hind) from the narration of al-ʿUqaylī with his isnād from al-ʿAṭṭār. I did not find it in the biography of al-ʿAṭṭār in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" by al-ʿUqaylī, and from the narration of Ibn ʿAdī in "al-Kāmil" (folio 154/2) from Sulaymān ibn Arqam from Ibn Sīrīn from Abū Hurayrah in a similar manner. Ibn al-Jawzī said: "Sulaymān ibn Arqam is abandoned, as is Saʿīd ibn Salām." Al-Suyūṭī responded by saying: "I say: the ḥadīth is ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ, and it has many paths and supporting evidence...." Then he mentioned it from the ḥadīth of Jābir. In it is the ʿanʿanah of Abū al-Zubayr, and it was also extracted by al-Muʿafá ibn Zakarīyā in "a Part of His Ḥadīth" (1/2) and all its narrators are trustworthy, and he attributed it to al-Ḥārith in "his Musnad" and al-Daylamī, and in their isnāds are those I did not recognize along with the ʿanʿanah. He also mentioned it from the ḥadīth of al-Bayhaqī in "Shuʿab al-Īmān" with his isnād from Abū Qatādah in a similar manner without the statement: "for they will be resurrected.....", and it includes mutual visitation. In its isnād is Salm ibn Ibrāhīm al-Warrāq whom Ibn Maʿīn declared a liar from ʿIkrimah ibn ʿAmmār, he said in "al-Taqrīb": "truthful but errs, and in his narration from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr there is confusion and he did not have a book." Then he mentioned for it some mawqūf supporting evidence, so the ḥadīth, in my view, is ḥasan with the totality of these paths. And Allāh knows best. Then I found a strong corroborator for al-Warrāq, as Ibn al-Sammāk said in "his Ḥadīth" (2/95/2): ʿAbd al-Malik narrated to us, Ismāʿīl ibn Sinān Abū ʿUbaydah al-ʿAsfarī narrated to us, ʿIkrimah ibn ʿAmmār narrated to us, he said: Hishām ibn Ḥassān narrated to us from Muḥammad ibn Sīrīn from Abū Qatādah in a marfūʿ manner. Similarly, it was extracted by Abū ʿAmr ibn Mandah in "al-Mukhtār min al-Fawāʾid" (folio 254/1) from Abū Qilābah al-Raqāshī, Ismāʿīl ibn Sinān Abū ʿUbaydah al-ʿAsfarī narrated to us in it. I say: This isnād is good in the supporting evidence and corroborations, its men are the men of Muslim except for al-ʿAsfarī, Abū Ḥātim said: there is no harm in his ḥadīth, and other than Abū Qilābah ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Muḥammad al-Raqāshī, the ḥāfiẓ said: