"authentic according to the criteria of al-Shaykhayn, but they did not include it." al-Dhahabī agreed with him. And I say: it is only according to the criteria of Muslim alone, for Ibn Yaʿqūb was only included by al-Bukhārī in "Juzʾ al-Qirāʾah" and he did not rely on him in "Ṣaḥīḥ," and he is trustworthy. The rest of its narrators are the men of al-Shaykhayn. Abū ʿĀmir al-ʿAqdī's name is ʿAbd al-Malik ibn ʿAmr al-Qaysī al-Baṣrī. ʿAlī ibn al-Mubārak was criticized by some regarding what he narrated specifically from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr, because he had two books from him, one heard directly and the other transmitted indirectly. However, the meticulous scholars among the ḥuffāẓ established a rule to distinguish between the two books, so Abū Dāwūd said to ʿAbbās al-ʿAnbarī: "How is the book of indirect transmission recognized? He said: the one with Wakīʿ from him from ʿIkrimah is from the book of indirect transmission, and people used to write the book of direct hearing." Ibn ʿAmmār said about Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd: "As for what we narrated from him, it is from what he heard, and as for what the Kufans narrated from him, it is from the book which he did not hear." This is what the ḥāfiẓ relied upon, as he said in "al-Taqrīb": "He had two books from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr, one heard directly and the other indirectly, so the ḥadīth of the Kufans from him has some issues." Moreover, Ibn ʿAdī declared him trustworthy in his narration from Yaḥyá, saying in "al-Kāmil" (Q 192/1) after listing some of his ḥadīths: "ʿAlī ibn al-Mubārak has other narrations, and he is reliable in narrating from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr and is preferred in Yaḥyá, and in my view, there is no harm in him." Knowing this, ʿUmar ibn Rāshid contradicted him in both isnād and matn, saying: from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr from Abū Salamah from Abū Hurayrah with it, except that he said: "The one who is devoted to the remembrance of Allāh, the remembrance removes their burdens, so they come on the Day of Resurrection light."