al-Ḥākim also reported it through the route of ʿAṭāʾ al-Khurāsānī from ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb with the story, and Ibn Ḥibbān also reported it (6108), but "ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb from his father" was omitted. It has supporting narrations; Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq narrated it from ʿAṭāʾ from Ṣafwān ibn Yaʿlá from his father, who said: and he mentioned it in full. al-Bayhaqī reported it (5/313), and the men of its isnād are trustworthy except for the ʿanʿanah of Ibn Isḥāq. Then he reported it through the route of Miqdām ibn Dāwūd, who said: Yaḥyá ibn Bukayr narrated to us, who said: Yaḥyá ibn Ṣāliḥ narrated to us from Ismāʿīl ibn Umayyah from ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Rabāḥ from Ibn ʿAbbās as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. And he said: "Yaḥyá ibn Ṣāliḥ al-Aylī was unique in narrating it, and it is objectionable with this isnād." I said: What precedes suffices from it. Gharīb al-ḥadīth: "Sale and loan": Ibn al-Athīr said: "It is like saying: I sold you this slave for a thousand on the condition that you lend me goods, or that you lend me a thousand, because he only lends to favor him in the price, which falls under the category of ignorance, and because every loan that draws a benefit is usury." "Two conditions in a sale": Ibn al-Athīr said: "It is like saying: I sold you this garment for a dinar in cash, and for two dinars on credit, and it is like two sales in one sale." I said: The prohibition of two sales in one sale has been authentically reported from the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd, and ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar, and they are included in the sources mentioned earlier, and it is a narration in the ḥadīth of the chapter with al-Bayhaqī. The narrators have consistently interpreted the two sales in one sale similarly to the interpretation of the two conditions in a sale, among them is Simāk ibn Ḥarb in the ḥadīth of Ibn Masʿūd with Aḥmad, and ʿAbd al-Wahhāb ibn ʿAṭāʾ in the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah with al-Bayhaqī, and al-Nasāʾī titled the ḥadīth of the chapter with his statement: