I said: al-Haythamī did not mention in "Zawāʾid Musnad al-Bazzār" another chain for the ḥadīth from Abū Hurayrah besides this one, so perhaps his statement "chains" is a miswriting of "chain." However, al-Munāwī quoted it from al-Haythamī as "chains." then he made a gross error by mentioning al-Haythamī's statement after the ḥadīth of Buraydah mentioned above, suggesting two things that are not true: first, that the ḥadīth of Buraydah has more than one ḥadīth, which is not the case. The other is that it is weak, which is also not the case, as its chain is authentic as al-Haythamī himself indicated earlier. It is astonishing that al-Haythamī did not include it with the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah in the indicated place, and it is unlikely that he mentioned it elsewhere in "al-Majmaʿ." It was also reported by Abū al-Shaykh in "Akhlaq al-Nabī ﷺ" (p. 274), al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (p. 278), Abū al-Qāsim ibn Abī Qaʿnab in "Ḥadīth al-Qāsim ibn al-Ashayb" (8/1), and al-Baghawī in "Sharḥ al-Sunnah" (4/71/2) through the chain of ʿAmr ibn Rāshid from Yaḥyá ibn Abī Kathīr. Al-Baghawī said: "ʿAmr ibn Rāshid is weak." Al-ʿUqaylī said: "No one follows him except someone weaker or similar to him." It seems he is referring to the earlier follow-up by ʿUmar ibn Abī Khutham. There is another supporting narration from Ibn ʿAbbās, narrated by al-Naḍr ibn Ismāʿīl al-Bajalī from Ṭalḥah ibn ʿAmr from ʿAṭāʾ from him, raised [to the Prophet]. It was reported by Ibn ʿAdī in "al-Kāmil" (q 205/1) and al-Daylamī in "al-Musnad" (1/1/104). Ibn ʿAdī said: "Most of what Ṭalḥah ibn ʿAmr narrates is not followed by others, and this ḥadīth is questionable." Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned it in "al-ʿIlal" (2/329) from this perspective and said: