" it was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" and one of its chains of transmission includes men who are the narrators of the authentic collections." (see the correction number 158/2). I have found another path for it from Abū ʿUthmān with an elevated chain in the wording: "Whoever performs ablution in his house and perfects it, then visits me in one of my houses, it is as if he visits me, and it is incumbent upon the one visited to honor his visitor." It was narrated by Ibn Bishrān in "al-Amālī" (153/1) from Saʿīd ibn Zurayb from Thābit from Abū ʿUthmān from Salmān with an elevated chain. I said: This Saʿīd is considered weak in ḥadīth as mentioned in "al-Taqrīb." And through his path, it was extracted by al-Salafī in "Juzʾ min Ḥadīthihi" (17/1) and he said: "This is a strange ḥadīth with an elevated chain; I do not know anyone who narrated it from al-Bannānī except Saʿīd ibn Zurayb, and the preserved narration from Abū ʿUthmān is stopped at Salmān." I said: And it was narrated by al-Bayhaqī similarly, stopped at the Companions of the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) with a sound chain as al-Mundhirī mentioned after his previous statement, and al-Ḥāfiẓ al-ʿIrāqī followed him in "Takhrīj al-Iḥyāʾ" (1/136 and 4/317). And the last sentence of it has a witness from the ḥadīth of Ibn Masʿūd with an elevated chain in the wording: "Indeed, the houses of Allāh on earth are the mosques, and it is incumbent upon Allāh to honor whoever visits Him in them." It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī (3/73/1) from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Abī Yaʿqūb al-Kirmānī: ʿAbd Allāh ibn Zayd al-Muqriʾ informed us, al-Masʿūdī informed us from Abū Isḥāq from ʿAmr ibn Maymūn from ʿAbd Allāh with an elevated chain. I said: And this is a weak chain; Abū Isḥāq, who is al-Sabīʿī, and al-Masʿūdī, who is ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUtbah ibn Masʿūd al-Kūfī, both had their memories mixed. And this al-Kirmānī, al-Dhahabī said in "al-Mīzān": "Weak." And with it, al-Haythamī criticized it in "al-Majmaʿ" (2/22) and Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt," so criticizing it due to those above him—as we have done—is more appropriate.