I said: there are several issues to be noted: First: In the narration of Ibn ʿAdī, Aḥmad ibn ʿUbayd is not present; rather, he appears in the narration of al-Bayhaqī in "al-Shuʿab" as I have seen, and al-Suyūṭī only attributed it to him. Thus, he missed this strong corroboration from Hishām ibn ʿAmmār in Ibn ʿAdī's narration. Second: The Jarāḥ ibn Mulayḥ mentioned in the ḥadīth is al-Bahrānī al-Ḥimṣī, and he is not the one about whom al-Dāraqutnī said what al-Munāwī quoted from him; rather, that was Jarāḥ ibn Mulayḥ al-Ruʾāsī, the father of Wakīʿ. Al-Dhahabī said about the first: he is more reliable than the father of Wakīʿ. Third: There is no contradiction from al-Dhahabī in his strengthening of the ḥadīth's isnād; rather, this is correct because there is no one among its narrators to be scrutinized except Jarāḥ, and you have known Ibn ʿAdī's statement about him. Therefore, al-Ḥāfiẓ said about him in "al-Taqrīb": "truthful." For this reason, he strengthened its isnād in "al-Fatḥ" as previously mentioned. Abū Rāfiʿ is Nufayʿ ibn Rāfiʿ al-Ṣāʾigh al-Madanī, a trustworthy narrator from the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhārī and Muslim]. Hishām ibn ʿAmmār has some criticism, although he is one of al-Bukhārī's teachers, but he has been corroborated as you know. 2 - As for the ḥadīth of Anas, it was narrated by al-Ḥākim (4/607) from Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥabīb from Sinān ibn Saʿd from him. Al-Ḥākim and al-Dhahabī remained silent about it, and its isnād is ḥasan, its narrators are trustworthy, narrators of the two Shaykhs except for Sinān ibn Saʿd, and it is said: Saʿd ibn Sinān, and he is truthful as in "al-Taqrīb." 3 - As for the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah, there are two paths from him: The first: from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Abī Ḥumayd from Abū al-Milīḥ from him. It was narrated by al-Bazzār (18 - Zawāʾid) and al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (268) and Ibn ʿAdī in "al-Kāmil" (236/2), and al-ʿUqaylī said: "ʿUbayd Allāh, al-Bukhārī said: munkar al-ḥadīth. And in this, there is a narration from another aspect with different wording, which also has weakness." I said: perhaps he is referring to the first path, and al-Ḥāfiẓ said about this ʿUbayd Allāh: "abandoned in ḥadīth."