"al-Ṣaḥīḥah" (266) - without attribution, of course - the ḥadīth's takhrīj, and in it: ".. and Aḥmad (1/153)," and this is an error! The correct version is: "and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad.." as it is corrected in my copy. In addition to that, he concealed from his readers that al-Tirmidhī graded it as ḥasan and that al-Ḥākim and al-Dhahabī authenticated it, and that I agreed with al-Tirmidhī. More astonishing and worse is that he imitated me (p. 518/25) in weakening ḥadīth number (1681 - al-Ḍaʿīfah), and his teacher Shuʿayb agreed with him on that, while I had retracted it and moved it to "al-Ṣaḥīḥah" (2827 and 2828) due to supporting evidence I found. How similar they are to the jinn about whom Allāh said: "Those whom they invoke seek a means of access to their Lord, as to which of them should be nearest..." (Sūrah al-Isrāʾ, verse 57)! If the man intended reform and advice, he would have attempted to salvage what he could from the weak ḥadīths by tracing the paths and supporting evidence to strengthen them if he were qualified for that. Otherwise, weakening authentic ḥadīths is not beyond the capability of atheists, let alone hypocrites and people of desires like Abū Riyā and his followers. In summary, in this section, there are indeed weak ḥadīths, which I had pointed out their weakness in the introduction as mentioned before, and I detailed their weakness in some of my previously mentioned works, from which the man took the summary and presented it to the readers as if it were his own effort and verification!! As for the other section, it is where he deviated from scientific principles and followed his desires, resulting in about 60 authentic ḥadīths being unjustly weakened, some of which are also in (al-Ṣaḥīḥ) like the ḥadīths (68, 116, 123, 127 according to the numbering in his al-Ḍaʿīfah). Among them is the ḥadīth of asceticism (number 20), where he ignored its paths and supporting evidence and referred to "al-Ṣaḥīḥah"! A response to his imitator has already been addressed in the introduction (pp. 13-17); you must refer to it. Expanding on the explanation of the flaws in his weakening of all of them requires authoring a special book, which is beyond my available time, so perhaps some of our strong brothers in this knowledge, like brother ʿAlī al-Ḥalabī, Samīr al-Zuhayrī, and Abū Isḥāq al-Ḥuwaynī, or others like them, will undertake this task, may Allāh reward them