"authentic according to the criteria of al-Bukhārī." and al-Dhahabī said: "according to the criteria of Muslim." I said: there is some consideration in all of this, for if this Isḥāq is Ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Ḥārith as al-Ḥākim mentioned, he is not among the narrators of al-Bukhārī or Muslim, but he is reliable and a group narrated from him. And if he is Abū Isḥāq, the client of al-Ḥārith, he is unknown as al-Dhahabī said, and if Isḥāq is not attributed, I do not know him. In "al-Majmaʿ" (10 /

"Aḥmad narrated it, and Abū Isḥāq, the client of ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Ḥārith ibn Nawfal, was not declared reliable by anyone, nor was he criticized by anyone, and the rest of the men of one of Aḥmad's isnāds are the men of the authentic collections." It has a corroborating narration from Ibn ʿAmr with the wording: "There is no group of people who sit in a gathering without mentioning Allāh, except that they will see it as a regret on the Day of Resurrection." 80 - "There is no group of people who sit in a gathering without mentioning Allāh, except that they will see it as a regret on the Day of Resurrection." (from Ibn ʿAmr): Aḥmad recorded it (2/124) with a good isnād. and al-Haythamī said: "Aḥmad narrated it, and its men are the men of the authentic collections." A second corroboration: al-Ṭayālisī recorded it (1756) from Jābir with a chain according to the criteria of Muslim