and he said: "A good ḥadīth." I said: This Yaḥyá is lenient in ḥadīth as mentioned in "Taqrīb," and see "Irwāʾ" (1593). 3 - As for the ḥadīth of Anas, it is narrated by Saʿīd ibn Abī ʿArūbah from Qatādah from him "that the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) was on Ḥirāʾ along with Abū Bakr, ʿUmar, and ʿUthmān...." the ḥadīth and he said: "and two martyrs." It was recorded by al-Khaṭīb in "al-Tārīkh" (5/365) through the route of Muḥammad ibn Yūnus who narrated to us from Quraysh ibn Anas who narrated from Saʿīd ibn Abī ʿArūbah. And this Ibn Yūnus is al-Kadīmī, who is accused, but he was not alone in narrating it as will be shown, for it was also recorded by al-Bukhārī (7/30), al-Tirmidhī (4/318) who authenticated it, and Aḥmad (3/112) through the route of Yaḥyá from Saʿīd with it, except that he said "Uḥud" instead of "Ḥirāʾ," and the ḥāfiẓ said in his commentary. "And it has appeared in a narration of Muslim and Abū Yaʿlá from another route from Saʿīd as 'Ḥirāʾ,' and the first is more authentic, and if it were not for the unity of the source, I would have considered the stories to be multiple. Then it became clear to me that the difference is from Saʿīd, for I found it in 'Musnad al-Ḥārith ibn Abī Usāmah' from Rūḥ ibn ʿUbādah from Saʿīd, where it was said 'Uḥud or Ḥirāʾ' with doubt." And I say there are two matters: first, the ḥadīth from the narration of Anas, I did not find it in "Muslim" at all, and al-Suyūṭī did not attribute it to him in "Ziyādah al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr" (6/2). The other: there is no doubt about the multiplicity of the story due to the multiplicity of routes, but it does not necessarily mean that Anas narrated all of that, and since Ibn Abī ʿArūbah had differences in it, it is because he was confused as mentioned in "Taqrīb." Therefore, one of the wordings must be preferred from him, so we looked and found that al-Bukhārī had