Muslim, and al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Tahdhīb" after mentioning it in the biography of al-Ḥasan: "This is a chain with no fault in any of its narrators, and it supports that he heard from Abū Hurayrah in general, and his story in this is similar to his story with Samurah." I said: meaning that what has been clarified regarding the scholars' disagreement on al-Ḥasan's hearing from Samurah is that he heard a little, and likewise, his hearing from Abū Hurayrah is established, but it is also little as indicated by this ḥadīth. And Allāh knows best. In summary, this chain is connected and authentic, so one should not pay attention to al-Nasāʾī's criticism of disconnection, because it necessitates one of two things: either accusing al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī of lying in his mentioned statement, or accusing one of the narrators who reported it from him. Both of these are impossible; the first is clear, and the latter, because it is not permissible to accuse reliable narrators without evidence or proof, and this is clearly evident. Then there are supporting narrations for the ḥadīth: the first is from Anas ibn Mālik, raised similarly. It was produced by al-Mukhliṣ in "al-ʿĀshir min Ḥadīthihi" (214/2) from Abū Suḥaym who narrated to us from ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Ṣuhayb from him. This chain is very weak, Abū Suḥaym - whose name is al-Mubārak ibn Suḥaym - al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "abandoned." The second is from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd that the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: and he mentioned it except that he said: "and the displaying women" instead of "and the removing women." It was produced by Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (8/376) and al-Khaṭīb in "al-Tārīkh" (3/358) through the route of Muḥammad ibn Hārūn al-Ḥaḍramī who narrated to us from al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī ibn al-Aswad al-ʿAjlī who narrated to us from Wakīʿ