and there is another supporting narration for the ḥadīth from Ibn ʿAbbās, raised with the wording: "Do not cover the walls... Ask Allāh with the palms of your hands..." and at the end, it adds: "When you finish, wipe your faces with them." It was recorded by Abū Dāwūd (1485) through the chain of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq from someone who narrated to him from Muḥammad ibn Kaʿb al-Qurẓī, who said that ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās narrated to me. He said: "This ḥadīth has been narrated through various chains from Muḥammad ibn Kaʿb, all of which are weak, and this chain is the best among them, yet it is also weak." I said: Its defect is the unnamed man, whom Ibn Mājah and others named as Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥassān, as I clarified in my commentary on "al-Mishkāt" (2243), and he is very weak, thus this addition is objectionable. I have not found any supporting narration for it so far. It seems for this reason that al-ʿIzz ibn ʿAbd al-Salām said, "Only an ignorant person wipes his face." Therefore, al-Munāwī's objection to him is unfounded, especially since this addition, even if it had a weak chain, could not be acted upon because it involves a legal ruling, which is the recommendation of the mentioned wiping, so how can it be when it is very weak? (Note) The ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar, raised with the wording: "When he raised his hands in supplication, he would not lower them until he wiped his face with them," is not suitable as supporting evidence for the addition. Because it includes someone accused of fabrication, and Abū Zurʿah said: "A rejected ḥadīth, I fear it has no basis." As I clarified in the commentary on "al-Mishkāt" (2245). Nor is the ḥadīth of al-Sāʾib ibn Yazīd from his father similar to it. It was recorded by Abū Dāwūd (1492). Because it includes Ibn Lahīʿah, who is weak, from Ḥafṣ ibn Hāshim
وللحديث شاهد آخر من حديث ابن عباس مرفوعا بلفظ: " لا تستروا الجدر ... سلوا الله ببطون أكفكم ... "، الحديث وزاد في آخره: فإذا فرغتم فامسحوا بها وجوهكم ". أخرجه أبو داود (١٤٨٥) من طريق عبد الله بن يعقوب بن إسحاق عمن حدثه عن محمد بن كعب القرظي حدثني عبد الله بن عباس. وقال: " روي هذا الحديث من غير وجه عن محمد بن كعب كلها واهية وهذا الطريق أمثلها وهو ضعيف أيضا ". قلت: وعلته الرجل الذي لم يسم وقد سماه ابن ماجه وغيره صالح ابن حسان كما بينته في تعليقي على " المشكاة " (٢٢٤٣) وهو ضعيف جدا وعلى ذلك فهذه الزيادة منكرة. ولم أجد لها حتى الآن شاهدا. وكأنه لذلك قال العز ابن عبد السلام " لا يمسح وجهه إلا جاهل ". فاعتراض المناوي عليه ليس في محله، كيف وهذه الزيادة لو كانت ضعيفة السند لم يجز العمل بها لأنها تضمنت حكما شرعيا وهو استحباب المسح المذكور، فكيف وهي ضعيفة جدا؟ (تنبيه) لا يصلح شاهدا للزيادة حديث ابن عمر مرفوعا: " كان إذا رفع يديه في الدعاء لم يحطهما حتى يمسح بهما وجهه ". لأن فيه متهما بالوضع، وقال أبو زرعة: " حديث منكر أخاف أن لا يكون له أصل ". كما بينته في التعليق على " المشكاة " (٢٢٤٥) . ولا حديث السائب بن يزيد عن أبيه نحوه. أخرجه أبو داود (١٤٩٢) . لأن فيه ابن لهيعة وهو ضعيف عن حفص بن هاشم.