I said: There is a consideration here, as Ibn Ṣāliḥ has some weakness due to his memory. Abū ʿĀmir al-Hawzanī's name is ʿAbdullāh ibn Luḥay, and he is trustworthy, but it seems he is not al-Ahlahānī, as Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned him in "al-Kuná" (4/2/411) without any criticism or praise, and Ibn Ḥibbān also mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" (1/271-272). As for ʿAbdullāh ibn Luḥay, they both mentioned him in "al-Asmāʾ," which indicates a distinction, although the work of al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar suggests otherwise, as he mentioned Abū ʿĀmir al-Ahlahānī in "al-Kuná" and said, "His name is ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿĀmir," as previously stated. We returned to "al-Asmāʾ" and did not find anyone named ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿĀmir with the kunyah Abū ʿĀmir from this generation, but we found him saying: "ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿĀmir ibn Luḥay" in the biography of ʿAbdullāh ibn Luḥay. This indicates that ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿĀmir, known as Abū ʿĀmir al-Ahlahānī, is considered by him to be ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿĀmir ibn Luḥay, known as Abū ʿĀmir al-Hawzanī, contradicting the distinction made between them in "al-Kuná." This is correct. And Allāh knows best. Al-Mundhirī attributed the ḥadīth in "al-Targhīb" (2/271) to al-Ḥākim from the narration of Salmān as well, so it should be reviewed, as I did not find it in "al-Dhikr wa-l-Duʿāʾ" from his "Mustadrak."

- "Call upon Allāh, the Exalted, while being certain of the response, and know that Allāh does not respond to the supplication from a heedless, distracted heart." Narrated by al-Tirmidhī (2/261), al-Ḥākim (1/493), Abū Bakr al-Kalābādhī in "Miftāḥ Maʿānī al-Āthār" (6-7), and Ibn ʿAsākir (5/61/1) from Ṣāliḥ al-Murrī, from Hāshim ibn Ḥassān, from Muḥammad ibn Sīrīn, from Abū Hurayrah, as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. Al-Tirmidhī said: "A strange ḥadīth; we do not know it except through this chain." Al-Ḥākim said: "A sound isnād, uniquely narrated by Ṣāliḥ al-Murrī, who is one of the ascetics of the people of Basra."