(Q 64/2) from the route of al-Ṭabarānī, and Abū Nuʿaym said: "Zamʿah is the only one who narrated it." I say: He is weak. The other [narration]: from Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr al-Wāqifī from Abū al-Zubayr from him with it. Al-Muḥāmlī extracted it in the third of "al-Amālī" (Q 33/1). And this al-Wāqifī is weak as in "al-Taqrīb." Abū al-Zubayr is a mudallis and he narrated it with ʿanʿanah. But al-Haythamī said (3/151): "It was narrated by al-Bazzār and its men are the men of the authentic [collections]." So perhaps it is with al-Bazzār from other than these two routes. Then it became clear to me that it is from the first route in "Zawāʾid al-Bazzār" (p. 106) and it has a second witness from the ḥadīth of ʿUqbah ibn ʿĀmir. It was extracted by Abū al-Ḥasan ibn ʿAbd Kawayh in "Thalāthah Majālis" (Q 10/2) from the route of al-Ṭabarānī and Ibn ʿAdī (58/1) from Ibn Lahīʿah from Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥabīb from Abū al-Khayr from him. Ibn Lahīʿah is weak due to poor memory, and he is one of those whose narrations are used as supporting evidence. And a third mursal witness. It was extracted by al-Khaṭīb in "al-Talkhīṣ" (Q 108/2) from the route of Ismāʿīl ibn ʿAyyāsh from Ibrāhīm ibn Shuʿayth from Saʿīd ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Abī Hind. And this Ibrāhīm was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (1/1/105) without any criticism or endorsement