Some commentators said: "Ibn Hishām mentioned in the annotations of al-Tashīl: It is not heard from them except when accompanied by 'fa', which is an additional necessary element according to me." Al-Damāmīnī (182) quoted from Ibn al-Sayyid (183) regarding: "I took only a dirham": I took a dirham and was content with it, thus making it a conjunction. He said: "This is better than the statement of al-Taftāzānī and Ibn Hishām." It remains that the statement in (al-Muṭawwal) is refuted by saying that the 'fa' in the conditional response is not for embellishment but is one of the particles of meaning, which presents a contradiction. It is answered that the omitted condition is considered to rectify the mentioned 'fa' for embellishment, and there is no necessity in the meaning to consider the omitted condition. Thus, mentioning 'fa' for embellishing the expression strengthens the aspect of meaning by attending to the aspect of expression. This (14) and the more apparent is his statement (185): And it seems to be a second interpretation (186), then he estimated the omitted conditional tool as 'if', and similarly, it occurred to others. The truth is that nothing is omitted from the conditional tools except 'in'. Ibn Kamāl Pāshā presented (187) an objection after quoting from "al-Mughnī" (188) that it can mean "only" like "qad," and as a noun-verb meaning "sufficient": that it is appropriate