"I said: he is reliable in ḥadīth, and Ibn Ḥibbān did not mention him in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ," and he was one of the vessels of knowledge." In summary: the ḥāfiẓ erred in describing (al-Mubārak) with tadlīs al-taswiyah, and if the man explicitly states transmission from his shaykh, he is reliable in ḥadīth, and Allāh knows best. 18- The end of the ḥadīth (489). And it was followed by the narration of Muslim ibn Khālid from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr who said: al-Qāsim informed me of it. It was recorded by Aḥmad (6/70). This is a good isnād in follow-ups, Muslim ibn Khālid—who is al-Zanjī—al-Dhahabī said in "al-Mughnī": "Truthful but errs...". Al-Ḥāfiẓ said: "Truthful with many errors." And ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr, I think he is ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Qāsim, whom al-Zanjī attributed to his grandfather Abū Bakr al-Ṣiddīq. Then I found another route for the ḥadīth from the narration of ʿAmrah from ʿĀʾishah similar to the ḥadīth of the tarjamah. It was recorded by al-Bazzār (2/234/1592) with a good isnād, and al-Haythamī said (5/210): "..and its men are the men of the ṣaḥīḥ."