17- ḥadīth (455): First - Additional sources for extraction: ʿAlī ibn al-Jaʿd in "his Musnad" (2/1124-1125), and through his route Abū Yaʿlá in "his Musnad" (6/143) (No. 3419), and from him al-Khaṭīb (11/341), and al-Bazzār (4/231/3600 - Kashf al-Astār) from Mubārak ibn Faḍālah with it. Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "Mukhtaṣar Zawāʾid al-Bazzār" (2/2309): "This is a good isnād"! Thus he said; despite the fact that Mubārak is known for tadlīs al-taswiyah, as I have previously noted from him there, and I will mention the detailed discussion on it. The wording of this narration by al-Bazzār is: "two" instead of "two men," and I had pointed out under it that I did not find it in any of the mentioned sources there, so this is a new benefit, but it has no significant value; because it is anomalous, contradicting the narration of the trustworthy from Mubārak, and also his followers as will be shown. Yes, its value lies in clarifying that al-Ghazālī did not originate that wording, but rather transmitted it. Secondly - I had extracted there a strong follower for Mubārak ibn Faḍālah, who is Ḥammād ibn Salamah, and I responded to al-Khaṭīb's error regarding him, then I found a second follower for him, as al-Ṭabarānī said in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (1/163/1/3045): Ibrāhīm narrated to us, he said: Naṣr narrated to us, he said: ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Zubayr al-Yamādī narrated to us, he said: Thābit al-Bunānī narrated with it, and he said: "No one narrated it from Thābit except ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Zubayr." Thus he said, and it is subject to critique as previously mentioned. And ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Zubayr al-Yamādī, thus it was attributed in "al-Muʿjam", and likewise it is