and in conclusion, I say: with all these disputes, stubbornness, denial of scientific truths, and contradictions to the preservers of the Prophetic sunnah, and other matters that will be clarified in the second volume and elsewhere, if Allāh wills, despite all this, the man pretends in his response to me that the disagreement between us is merely personal, saying: "Why do you not tolerate my disagreement, while I must tolerate yours?!" Then he laments and asks indignantly: "How did you know that I and others write for our desires, have you looked into our hearts..?" I say: before answering, I ask: who do you mean by your words: "and others"? (al-Saqqāf) the enemy of the Salaf, the sunnah, and the preservers of the ummah, or others among the Muʿtazilah and the ignorant, and how many of them are there in this time when (the foolish) speak! For your statement makes me feel another trait in you that we did not know, which is that you do not judge anyone as being among (the people of desires) no matter how much they deviate from the people of the sunnah and its scholars, nor do you judge any of the disbelievers as disbelievers, no matter what they say and do; because it is not possible to look into hearts! If you see this, then this is a calamity and another disaster in which you contradict the Book, the sunnah, and the consensus of the ummah in a way that does not require research or evidence. I say: this is the necessary implication of your mentioned statement, but since it is known among scholars that the necessary implication of a doctrine is not itself a doctrine, I do not hold you to it, unless you explicitly commit to it, otherwise, declare your denial of it, and perhaps you will, for it suffices you what you have done. And now to the answer: