al-Suyūṭī indicated its authenticity, and the commentator did not discuss it. Al-Haythamī mentioned it in "al-Majmaʿ" (10/273-274) without the last sentence, saying: "It was narrated by Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī, and its isnād is good. Al-Ṭabarānī also narrated it in 'al-Awsaṭ', and in it is ʿAlī ibn Bahrām, whom I do not know, but the rest of its narrators are trustworthy." I say: It is not in the Musnad from the ḥadīth of Jābir, but rather there is the ḥadīth of Sahl ibn Saʿd and the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah, which were mentioned earlier. I say this after reviewing all the ḥadīths of Jābir in the "Musnad" one by one, and Allāh knows best the source of this error from al-Haythamī. He also mentioned it elsewhere (8/87) without falling into this error, where he said: "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ' through the route of ʿAlī ibn Bahrām from ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Abī Karīmah, whom I do not know, but the rest of its narrators are the narrators of the Ṣaḥīḥ." However, in this statement, there is a contradiction to what we previously quoted from him, which generally implies that ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Abī Karīmah is trustworthy, whereas here he is unknown. He is known among the narrators of Abū Dāwūd in the "Sunan" and is truthful and righteous, having died in the year 204—or it is said 210—as mentioned in "al-Taqrīb." The last sentence of it was extracted by al-Qaḍāʿī in "Musnad al-Shihāb" (101/1) through the route of ʿAlī ibn Bahrām, who said: ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Abī Karīmah informed us from Ibn Jurayj from ʿAṭāʾ from Jābir with it. ʿAmr ibn Bakr al-Saksakī followed him from Ibn Jurayj with it. It was extracted by Ibn ʿAsākir in "Tārīkh Dimashq" (2/420/2). But this ʿAmr is abandoned. It has a supporting narration from the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar, who said: