and there is another route from Abū Dharr in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" by al-Ṭabarānī (1/23-25). Another supporting narration is from the ḥadīth of Jābir: found in Muslim through the route of Abū al-Zubayr from him. ʿAmr ibn Dīnār also followed him from Jābir in full. It was recorded by Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (7/316) through the route of al-Ḥusayn ibn Ismāʿīl: Isḥāq ibn Bahalūl narrated to us: Yaḥyá ibn al-Ḥusayn narrated to us from Ibn ʿUyaynah from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār with it. He said: "It is rare from the ḥadīth of Sufyān from ʿAmr, we did not write it except from the ḥadīth of al-Ḥusayn." I said: and al-Ḥusayn—who is Ibn Ismāʿīl—is Abū ʿAbd Allāh al-Qāḍī al-Muḥāmilī, and he is a reliable memorizer, and those above him are trustworthy; except for Yaḥyá ibn al-Ḥusayn, whom I did not know. And Allāh knows best. Another supporting narration for the ḥadīth of the chapter is from the ḥadīth of Iyās ibn Salamah ibn al-Akwaʿ from his father that the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: ... and he mentioned it in full. It was recorded by Aḥmad (4/48), and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (7/23/6255) through the route of ʿUmar ibn Rāshid al-Yamāmī who said: Iyās ibn Salamah narrated to us with it. Its men are trustworthy; except for ʿUmar ibn Rāshid al-Yamāmī; for he is weak. But he was followed by ʿAlī ibn Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥakīm al-Aslamī: Iyās ibn Salamah narrated to me with it. It was also recorded by al-Ḥākim as a witness for the ḥadīth of ʿArāk, and he mentioned that its isnād is authentic! However, there is some consideration; because ʿAlī ibn Yazīd was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim from the narration of Dhūʾayb ibn al-ʿAmāmah al-Sahmī and al-Ḥumaydī; and he did not mention any criticism or endorsement about him. As for Ibn Ḥibbān; he mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" (7/206)!