10. Hishām ibn Zayd: reported by al-Bukhārī (3799) and others. It is extracted in this "series" under number (3430). Secondly: the ḥadīth of Usayd ibn Ḥuḍayr reported by al-Nasāʾī in "al-Kubrā" (8324), and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" (552) through the route of Ḥaramī ibn ʿAmārah from Shuʿbah from Qatādah from Anas from Usayd with it. Al-Mizzī said in "Tuḥfat al-Ashrāf" (1/73): "It was reported by Ghundar from Shuʿbah, and he did not mention Usayd." I say: this is more likely; for Ḥaramī is truthful but makes mistakes, while Ghundar—who is Muḥammad ibn Jaʿfar—is trustworthy; he is among the most reliable and firm narrators from Shuʿbah. The narration referred to is the first narration extracted in the ḥadīth of Anas mentioned earlier. Al-Haythamī said in "al-Majmaʿ" (10/37): "Its men are the men of (the Ṣaḥīḥ)!" But he—may Allāh have mercy on him—did not point out this subtle defect. Thirdly: the ḥadīth of Abū Saʿīd al-Khudrī: reported by al-Tirmidhī (3904), Aḥmad (3/89), and Abū Yaʿlá (1358) through the route of Zakarīyā ibn Abī Zāʾidah from ʿAṭiyyah al-ʿAwfī from him with it. ʿAṭiyyah is weak; and in its text is an objectionable addition, and because of it, I included it in "Ḍaʿīf al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa-Ziyādatuh" (2174), and see "al-Mishkāt" (6240)