It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" (9/104/8532): ʿAlī ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz narrated to us: ʿĀrim Abū al-Nuʿmān narrated to us: Ḥammād ibn Zayd narrated to us... I said: This isnād is authentic; its men are all trustworthy. Ḥammād ibn Zayd heard from ʿAṭāʾ ibn al-Sāʾib before the confusion. Despite that, al-Haythamī also said (2/256): "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Kabīr', and its isnād is good"! So he did not authenticate it, perhaps because ʿĀrim Abū al-Faḍl—whose name is Muḥammad ibn al-Faḍl—became confused or changed. Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "Trustworthy, reliable, changed at the end of his life." Al-Dhahabī said in "al-Kāshif": ".. the ḥāfiẓ, and from him (Kh) .. changed before his death; so he did not narrate." He said in "al-Mīzān": "A truthful, prolific ḥāfiẓ." Then he mentioned some statements that explicitly stated his confusion, but he quoted al-Dāraquṭnī saying: "He changed at the end, and no objectionable ḥadīth appeared from him after his confusion, and he is trustworthy." With this, he refuted Ibn Ḥibbān, who claimed that many objectionable reports appeared in his ḥadīth! Al-Dhahabī said: "I said: Ibn Ḥibbān could not present an objectionable ḥadīth from him, so where is what he claimed?!"