the client of Ghufrah), so I thought it might have been omitted by the printer. I returned to verify in "Jāmiʿ al-Masānīd" by Ibn Kathīr; in the biography of (Mujāhid from Abū Dharr) (13/768); but I did not find it there, as if it was omitted from it. Then I returned to "Aṭrāf al-Musnad" by Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (6/185/8071), and I found it as it is in "al-Musnad". It became more likely to me that it was an old omission, possibly by some copyists, or by ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Muʾammal himself, who sometimes included it and sometimes omitted it, which further confirms its weakness. And Allāh knows best. However, I saw that al-Haythamī said in "al-Majmaʿ" (2/228): "It was narrated by Aḥmad, and al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ', and in it is ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Muʾammal al-Makhzūmī; Aḥmad and others weakened him, while Ibn Maʿīn in one narration and Ibn Ḥibbān authenticated him, and said: 'He makes mistakes', and the rest of Aḥmad's narrators are narrators of (al-Ṣaḥīḥ)!" I said: So al-Haythamī did not differentiate between the narration of Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī, so either their narrations are the same, with the first containing what the other confirms of the mention of (Ḥumayd) in the isnād, making al-Haythamī's copy of "al-Musnad" different from the copy of the ḥāfiẓ in "al-Aṭrāf", or he attributed the narration of "al-Musnad" to the narration of al-Ṭabarānī, with its omission, doing so either leniently or inadvertently! And this is more likely. And Allāh knows best. *From his generosity (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) and his good judgment

- (Half is a judgment for you, and half is a gift from me). It was recorded by al-Bayhaqī in "al-Sunan" (5/351), and "Shuʿab al-Īmān" (7/531/11237) through two chains from Abū ʿAbd Allāh al-Būshanji Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm: Abū Ṣāliḥ al-Farrāʾ narrated to us