narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr"; as mentioned in the original "Ṣifat al-Ṣalāh" without specifying the volume and page, so I do not know from where I copied it that day?! And Ismāʿīl al-Bajalī and Thuwair ibn Abī Fākhitah are both weak. The ḥadīth has a supporting narration from Ibn Masʿūd; narrated by ʿAbd al-Malik ibn al-Walīd ibn Maʿdān from ʿĀṣim ibn Bahdalah from Abū Wāʾil from him, who said: I cannot count how many times I heard the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) recite ... the ḥadīth with addition. Narrated by al-Tirmidhī (431), Ibn Mājah (1166), Ibn Naṣr also, and al-Ṭaḥāwī (1/175-176). Al-Tirmidhī said: "It is a strange ḥadīth, we do not know it except from the narration of ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Maʿdān." I said: He is weak as in "al-Taqrīb." Al-Dhahabī said in his book "al-Mughnī": "They considered him weak." There is another supporting narration; but in its isnād is Aṣram ibn Ḥawshab with his isnād from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Jaʿfar similarly. Narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (8/373) among a group of ḥadīths with this isnād under number (7757), and he stated that it is not narrated except with this isnād. I said: He is very weak; this Aṣram is abandoned and accused, so he is not someone whose narration is used as evidence. What I can conclude from this investigation and verification: is that the ḥadīth is authentic by itself, or by others due to the totality of its chains from Ibn ʿUmar, and with its supporting narration from Ibn Masʿūd, and the first is more likely in my view, due to the agreement of the three trustworthy narrators on narrating it from Abū Isḥāq al-Sabīʿī from Mujāhid from Ibn ʿUmar