Ibn ʿAlī ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd al-Kinānī) was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (4/2/175) through the narration of his son (Abū Ghassān) only, and he did not mention any criticism or endorsement about him. al-Haythamī did not comment on this isnād, mistakenly thinking that it included (Ḥammād ibn al-Jaʿd) mentioned in the first path, as was previously pointed out. 3- As for the ḥadīth of Abū Ayyūb, it is narrated by ʿAmr ibn Hāshim al-Bayrūtī: Thana al-Haql ibn Ziyād from al-Awzāʿī from ʿUthmān ibn Abī Sawdah from Abū Shuʿayb al-Ḥaḍramī from him, elevated in the second narration, and added: "for that suffices him." It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" (4/208/4055) and "al-Awsaṭ" (4/112-113/3170), and he said: "No one narrated it from al-Awzāʿī except al-Haql, and ʿAmr was unique in narrating it." I say: He is truthful but errs, as al-Ḥāfiẓ said. If his ḥadīth is not deemed good, it is at least used as supporting evidence, as he was followed in "al-Tamhīd" (22/311), and it was deemed good. Those above him are trustworthy from the men of "al-Tahdhīb," except for Abū Shuʿayb al-Ḥaḍramī, whom Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned through this narration of al-Awzāʿī, without any criticism or endorsement; thus, he is unknown. al-Haythamī said: "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Kabīr' and 'al-Awsaṭ,' and its men are reliable, except that I have not seen any endorsement or criticism for Abū Shuʿayb, the companion of Abū Ayyūb!" I say: He missed that Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "Thiqāt al-Tābiʿīn" (5/572), and he is not..