the man stood up, kissed his head, hands, and feet, and embraced Islam. This was recorded by al-Bazzār in "Musnad" (3/132-133, Kashf al-Astār), as well as by Ibn al-Aʿrābī in "Kitāb al-Qubal" (p. 6), and Abū Nuʿaym in "Dalāʾil al-Nubuwwah" (pp. 332-333). Al-Bazzār said: "We do not know anyone who narrated it from Ṣāliḥ except Ḥibbān, and we do not know of any narration about kissing the head except this one." I said: Its isnād is weak because both Ṣāliḥ and Ḥibbān are weak, as mentioned in "Taqrīb" and elsewhere. In the chapter, there is another story similar to the ḥadīth of the translation from the narration of Ibn ʿUmar (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu) with an authentic isnād according to al-Bazzār and others. It was authenticated by Ibn Ḥibbān and others, and it is included in "al-Mishkāt" under number (5925). Shaykh Ḥabīb al-Aʿẓamī—may Allāh pardon us and him—confused it in his commentary on "Kashf al-Astār" (3/133) with the ḥadīth of ʿUmar (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu); he narrated it through the path of ʿAlī ibn Zayd from Abū Rāfiʿ from him, and said in his commentary: "Al-Haythamī said: It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī and its men are the men of the ṣaḥīḥ, and it was also narrated by Abū Yaʿlá and al-Bazzār (8/292). I (al-Aʿẓamī) said: In its isnād is ʿAlī ibn Zayd, and he is considered ḥasan in ḥadīth according to al-Haythamī and al-Bazzār"! I said: The confusion lies in his claim that in the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar according to al-Bazzār there is ʿAlī ibn Zayd—who is Ibn Judʿān! This is a pure error, as it is only in the isnād of the ḥadīth of ʿUmar as I have seen. Al-Haythamī mentioned it elsewhere and said about it (9/10):