and the other two are from the Followers of the Followers: one of them (7/426) was attributed to his grandfather Ibn Abī ʿAyyāsh, and he narrates from ʿAṭāʾ ibn Yasār. From him, Abū Awīs narrated. The other (7/427) narrated from ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān from ʿAlī, and from him, Sharīk narrated. If you understand this, it is difficult to determine that they are the ones intended in this ḥadīth! Moreover, there is no notable benefit from this, as they are all considered unknown, despite al-Bukhārī's action in "al-Tārīkh" (1/1/236) indicating that it is the Successor who narrates from Ibn ʿAbbās. It is noteworthy that Ibn Abī Ḥātim did not mention this at all; rather, he mentioned the one from whom Abū Awīs narrated, and another who narrated from al-Qāsim ibn Mukhaimirah, and from him al-Awzāʿī, and his father said about him: "unknown." It is astonishing that none of these four were mentioned in "al-Mīzān" nor in "al-Lisān." Yes, the one mentioned first—the narrator from Ibn ʿAbbās—was mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb," and in "al-Taqrīb" it was said: "obscure." He was also mentioned in "al-Taʿjīl," and it was reported from al-Ḥusaynī that he said: "unknown." And he affirmed it. This is what is said about Muḥammad ibn Abī Mūsá. As for his teacher Ziyād al-Anṣārī, it is possible, as mentioned by al-Haythamī, that he is Ziyād Abū Yaḥyá