and this isnād consists of trustworthy men, so it is a good isnād except for the weakness found in Ibn Lahīʿah, which became apparent in his ḥadīths after the burning of his original manuscripts and books. It is evident that this is among those whose wording was not accurately preserved. In any case, it serves as a reasonable supporting evidence in general; because his statement: (neither for you) aligns with other narrations that agree on the prohibition. As for his statement: (nor against you), it contradicts the prohibition and the command to break the fast even with the bark of a tree; it is among the confusions of Ibn Lahīʿah. And Allāh knows best. (Note): The mention in the isnād: (ʿUmayr ibn Jubayr) is an error resulting from a transcription mistake. The correct name is (ʿUbayd ibn Ḥunayn), as mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb," as stated by al-Ḥāfiẓ in "al-Taʿjīl" (321/819). The ḥadīth has already been mentioned in this "series" (225 - new edition of Maktabat al-Maʿārif), and both instances contain additional benefit. *

(Beware of trivial sins, like a people who camped in the bottom of a valley, and one brought a stick, and another brought a stick until they cooked their bread. Indeed, when the owner is taken to account for trivial sins, they will destroy him). It was narrated by Imām Aḥmad (5/331): Anas ibn ʿIyāḍ narrated to us: Abū Ḥāzim narrated to me—I do not know it except—from Sahl ibn Saʿd who said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said... and he mentioned it. I say: This isnād is authentic according to the criteria of al-Bukhārī and Muslim, and it is among the thulāthiyyāt of "al-Musnad." It was also narrated by al-Ruyānī in "his Musnad" (29/12/1-2), and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (6/204/5872) and "al-Awsaṭ" (2/161/7459) and "al-Ṣaghīr" (p. 187 - Hindiyyah) through other chains from Anas ibn ʿIyāḍ with it. And al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr said in "al-Tafsīr"