it seems that this narration occurred to him in this way, and therefore he titled it by saying: "Mention of the obligation of the Fire for whoever makes the People of the Book hear what they dislike!" Al-Bazzār said after the ḥadīth: "We do not know anyone who narrated it from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) except Abū Mūsá with this isnād, and I do not think Saʿīd heard it from Abū Mūsá." I said: This is because Abū Mūsá passed away in the year 53 according to most reports, and Saʿīd ibn Jubayr was born in the year 46; thus, he only witnessed six years of Abū Mūsá's life at most. This is something that escaped al-ʿAlāʾī; he did not mention it in "Jāmiʿ al-Taḥṣīl"! So it should be noted. The ḥadīth was recorded by al-Nasāʾī in "al-Tafsīr" from "al-Sunan al-Kubrā" (6/363-364) through the route of Khālid from Shuʿbah with it. Al-Haythamī mentioned it in "al-Majmaʿ" (8/261-262) in its entirety; however, he did not mention: "all the religions." He said: "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī—with this wording—and Aḥmad in a similar manner, and the men of Aḥmad are the men of 'al-Ṣaḥīḥ', and al-Bazzār also in a summarized form." I said: But Aḥmad only has the elevated part of it. We conclude from this extraction and verification: that the most authentic of these three perspectives is the first; due to the agreement of Ayyūb and al-Thaqafī on it, and the agreement of Shuʿbah and Abū ʿAmr al-Baṣrī on its connection does not counterbalance them; due to their disagreement, as the first made it from the Musnad of Abū Mūsá and the other from the Musnad of Ibn ʿAbbās. As for Shuʿbah; because even though he connected it, it is disconnected between Saʿīd and Abū Mūsá as previously mentioned. As for Abū ʿAmr; it is known from his biography that he is not well-known; thus, what he disagreed with the trustworthy narrators on is not used as evidence