after reviewing the condition of these three narrators, we can conclude that this isnād is ḥasan in itself and ṣaḥīḥ by other means. And Allāh is the Guardian of success. *

- (He sprinkled water on the grave of his son Ibrāhīm). It was recorded by Abū Dāwūd in "al-Marāsīl" (304/424), and through him by al-Bayhaqī in "al-Sunan" (3/311) through two chains from ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Muḥammad from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad - meaning Ibn ʿUmar - from his father in a mursal form. And his father - he is Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib - is truthful, from the followers of the followers. However, it has also been reported in a connected form with another isnād for ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Muḥammad. Al-Ṭabarānī said in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (2/80/1/6282): Muḥammad ibn Zuhayr al-Abalī narrated to us; he said: Aḥmad ibn ʿAbdah al-Ḍabbī narrated to us, he said: ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Muḥammad al-Darāwardī narrated to us from Hishām ibn ʿUrwah from his father from ʿĀʾishah in a marfūʿ form. And he said: "No one narrated it from Hishām ibn ʿUrwah except al-Darāwardī; Aḥmad ibn ʿAbdah was unique in narrating it." I say: He is trustworthy, one of the shaykhs of Muslim, and likewise, all those above him are trustworthy from his men, so the isnād is ṣaḥīḥ if Muḥammad ibn Zuhayr al-Abalī was followed as indicated by the aforementioned statement of al-Ṭabarānī, otherwise it is ḥasan; because there is some discussion about this al-Abalī; al-Dhahabī said in "al-Mīzān": "al-Dāraqutnī said: He made mistakes in ḥadīths, but there is no harm." And Ibn Ghulām al-Zuhrī said: He became confused two years before his death, he died in the year three hundred and eighteen, and a person from Ḥarrān introduced a ḥadīth to him."