is contradicted by Ismāʿīl ibn Yaḥyá ibn Salamah ibn Kuhayl, who said: from his father, from Salamah, from Saʿīd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abzá with it, adding at the end: "And when we reach the evening, the same applies." It was reported by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad in the additions to "al-Musnad" (5/123) who said: Ibrāhīm ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Yaḥyá ibn Salamah ibn Kuhayl narrated to me: my father narrated to me. I say: This isnād is very weak, as Ibrāhīm is weak, and his father Ismāʿīl ibn Yaḥyá and his grandfather are both abandoned, as mentioned in "al-Taqrīb," but the father has been followed up as previously mentioned, so the flaw is Yaḥyá ibn Salamah. The ḥadīth was mentioned by al-Haythamī in "al-Majmaʿ" (10/116) with the addition of Wakīʿ, and he said: "It was narrated by Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī, and their narrators are the narrators of the ṣaḥīḥ." al-Nawawī attributed it in "al-Adhkār" to Ibn al-Sunnī only, and said: "Its isnād is ṣaḥīḥ," which is far-fetched, and he was followed by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-ʿIrāqī in "Takhrīj al-Iḥyāʾ" (1/327) and attributed it to al-Nasāʾī. al-Ḥāfiẓ disagreed in "Takhrīj al-Adhkār," saying (2/379): "A ḥasan ḥadīth!" Then he mentioned the disagreement between Sufyān and Shuʿbah, and then said: "With this disagreement, it is not possible to judge it as ṣaḥīḥ. And Allāh's help is sought." And I say: Not every disagreement is worthy of consideration, for the preferred narration is certainly that of Sufyān over that of Shuʿbah, and such a matter is not hidden from someone like al-Ḥāfiẓ, so it appears he was not able to..