and Shaykh al-Aʿẓamī assumed that Ibn Judʿān was omitted from its isnād, influenced by the inclusion of al-Haythamī mentioned earlier. He said in his commentary on "Kashf al-Astār" following his previous statement: "I said: In the original, there is no (ʿAlī ibn Zayd) in the isnād of the ḥadīth of ʿIkrimah from Ibn ʿAbbās." I said: And it should not be, for he does not have a narration from ʿIkrimah, unlike Muḥammad ibn ʿAwn al-Khurāsānī, as they mentioned him among those who narrated from him. The third path: from Mūsá ibn Ibrāhīm ibn Jaʿfar ibn Mihrān al-Sabbāk: My father Ibrāhīm ibn Jaʿfar ibn Mihrān informed us, Sulaymān ibn Ḥarb informed us, Shuʿbah informed us from Ḥabīb ibn Abī Thābit from Saʿīd ibn Jubayr from him with it. It was also narrated by Ibn ʿAsākir. I said: I did not know Mūsá ibn Ibrāhīm al-Sabbāk or his father, and those above him are from the men of the two Shaykhs, except that Ibn Abī Thābit is a mudallis. 2 - ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr ibn al-ʿĀṣ or his father ʿAmr, narrated by Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib from him. It was narrated by al-Ṭabarī in "al-Tafsīr" (3/174), al-Bazzār (2360), and Ibn ʿAsākir (18/82) through paths from Yaḥyá with it. Some said: from Ibn ʿAmr, and some: from ʿAmr, and one: from Ibn al-ʿĀṣ, and some stopped it, and all of this does not harm, for it is in the ruling of marfūʿ, especially since the addition of a trustworthy narrator is accepted, and whether the musnad is Ibn ʿAmr or his father, it is a transition from one Companion to another, and all of them are trustworthy, and the more likely it is from Ibn ʿAmr, for Saʿīd is known for narrating from him. Al-Ṭabarī and Ibn ʿAsākir added: He said: Then the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) lowered his hand to the ground, took a small stick, and then said: