and the other chain is narrated by Baqiyyah ibn al-Walīd: Ibrāhīm ibn Adham informed us, my father Adham ibn Manṣūr told me from Saʿīd ibn Jubayr from him in a summarized form similar to it, without his saying: "he names it..." etc. It was recorded by Ibn ʿAsākir in "Tārīkh Dimashq" (4/574). As for Adham ibn Manṣūr, I did not find anyone who documented him, but the rest of the narrators are reliable. 4 - As for the ḥadīth of Anas, it is narrated by ʿUthmān ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ṭarāʾifī from ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn al-Ḥuṣayn from Thābit al-Bunānī from him in a similar manner. It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (2/146/1/7255) and he said: "No one narrated it from Thābit except ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn al-Ḥuṣayn, and ʿUthmān ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān was unique in narrating it." I said: The ḥāfiẓ said: "He is truthful, but he narrated extensively from the weak and unknown narrators, which caused his weakness, to the extent that Ibn Numayr accused him of lying, although Ibn Maʿīn considered him reliable." And ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn al-Ḥuṣayn is among those weak narrators referred to, and there is consensus on his weakness. Al-Ḥākim disagreed and included him in "al-Mustadrak," saying: "He is trustworthy," and likewise the ḥāfiẓ expressed surprise at this in "al-Lisān." Al-Haythamī said: "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ,' and in it is ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn al-Ḥuṣayn, who is weak." In summary: the ḥadīth is authentic when considering all its chains, especially since the second chain of the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah is sound in itself as mentioned earlier, thus it is authentic. And Allāh knows best