Muḥammad ibn Sīrīn who said: from Abū al-ʿĀliyah, and it has been mentioned. He (S) said in the ḥadīth of Yaḥyá (!) this is correct and the previous is incorrect. And Allāh knows best." I said: And the narration of ʿAmr ibn ʿAlī... from Abū al-ʿAlāniyyah... and the corroboration of Yazīd ibn Hārūn, I did not see it in "al-Walīmah al-Nasāʾī al-Kubrā," nor in other places where it might be found, unlike the narration of Mukhlad, which is in "al-Ashriba" from it, from the printed and photographed copies that I have, but it occurred in it "Abū al-ʿĀliyah," and for that reason al-Nasāʾī said after it: "Abū al-ʿĀliyah is correct, and the previous is incorrect." I said: And nothing in the printed version contradicts the mentioned correctness, so it appears that there is an omission indicated by what has preceded. Then it seems that his statement in the printed version "Abū al-ʿĀliyah" is an error by the printer or scribe in the isnād and al-Nasāʾī's comment on it, and the correct in both places is: Abū al-ʿAlāniyyah," and thus it aligns with the previous statement of al-Mizzī, and agrees with the statement of al-Ḥāfiẓ al-ʿAsqalānī in the biography of Abū al-ʿAlāniyyah: "And it was said from Muḥammad from Abū al-ʿĀliyah from Abū Saʿīd. Al-Nasāʾī said: And it is incorrect." And it also seems that the mentioned error is old, for al-Mizzī said after his previous statement: "It occurred in some copies: 'from Abū al-ʿĀliyah' in both ḥadīths, and Abū al-Qāsim (meaning Ibn ʿAsākir) also mentioned them, and it is a mistake, for al-Nasāʾī has pointed out the discrepancy in two places. And Allāh knows best." And based on this, what is in the two sources mentioned at the beginning of the extraction with al-Nasāʾī: Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī is also incorrect, and it is supported regarding the narration of Aḥmad that al-Mizzī narrated it with his isnād from Aḥmad