rather, its ruling is like that of the Prophetic ḥadīths and the sacred ḥadīths, as tawātur is not a condition for them, even though some of them are mutawātir, like this one, as it was narrated by five or more Companions as previously mentioned. Then the one referred to said: "And 'we see,' in the ḥadīth - with the nūn pronounced with ḍammah - means we think, and conjecture is the opposite of certainty, and it may be certainty with context, which is not present here." So I say: this is based on the condition mentioned in the abrogated recitation, which is invalid as you know, and what is built on falsehood is false. From what has been previously mentioned, you learn that supporting his view with what he quoted from the ḥāfiẓ regarding the interpretation of their mentioned conjecture - does not benefit him at all, because the ḥāfiẓ mentioned it among the possibilities in interpreting some ḥadīths, and did not rely on it, but rather relied on the other which was previously quoted from him, and criticized it by saying: "it is among those whose recitation was abrogated decisively, even though its ruling continues." He supported it with the ḥadīth of Abū Mūsá and the ḥadīth of Jābir, so I do not know how this referred person ignored it, especially when there are other preceding ḥadīths that instill certainty in the soul that the ḥadīth was part of the Qurʾān and then its recitation was abrogated. In my opinion, he was not aware of them, and if he had been aware, he would not have said what he said, otherwise his statement indicates a poor state. We ask Allāh for safety. This discussion led me to investigate the ḥadīth "The elderly man and woman if they commit adultery," because it is among the well-known abrogated recitations among scholars, and I followed that with what the ḥāfiẓ mentioned about the Companions regarding abrogated recitation, so that the referred person and others who investigate ḥadīths may know that knowledge and understanding in the book and the sunnah is one thing, and the profession of investigating ḥadīths is another. And Allāh is the one whose help is sought.
بل حكمه حكم الأحاديثالنبوية والأحاديث القدسية، فإنه لا يشترط فيها التواتر، وإن كان فيها ماهو متواتر، كهذا، فإنه رواه خمسة من الأصحاب أو أكثر كما سبق. ثم قال المومىإليه: " و " نرى "، في الحديث - بضم النون - معناها نظن، والظن عكس اليقين، وقد يكون إياه بقرينة، وليست موجودة هنا ". فأقول: هذا مبني على الشرطالذي ذكره في منسوخ التلاوة، وهو باطل كما عرفت، وما بني على باطل فهو باطل. ومما سلف تعلم أن تأييده ما ذهب إليه بما نقله عن الحافظ من توجيهه لظنهمالمذكور - لا يفيده شيئا، لأن الحافظ ذكره في جملة ما ذكره من الاحتمالات فيتوجيه بعض الأحاديث، ولم يعتمد عليه، بل اعتمد على الآخر الذي سبق نقله عنه، وحط عليه بقوله: " فهو مما نسخت تلاوته جزما، وإن كان حكمه مستمرا ". وأيده بحديث أبي موسى، وحديث جابر، فلا أدري كيف تجاهله هذا المومى إليه،فكيف وهناك الأحاديث الأخرى المتقدمة التي تلقي اليقين في النفس أن الحديث كانمن القرآن ثم نسخت تلاوته، وفي ظني أنه لم يعلم بها، وإنه لو علم بها ماقال ما قال، وإلا دل قوله على سوء الحال. نسأل الله السلامة. وهذا البحثمما ساقني إلى تخريج حديث " الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا "، لأنه من مشاهير منسوخالتلاوة عند العلماء، وأتبع ذلك بما ذكره الحافظ عن الصحابة في منسوخ التلاوة، ليعلم المومى إليه وغيره من المخرجين أن العلم والفقه في الكتاب والسنةشيء، ومهنة تخريج الأحاديث شيء آخر. والله المستعان.