I said: This isnād is obscure, filled with defects: 1 - Jaʿfar ibn Saʿd ibn Samurah, about whom al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "He is not strong." 2 - Khabīb ibn Sulaymān, unknown. 3 - His father, Sulaymān ibn Samurah, is acceptable. I said: Based on this, the addition is objectionable.

- "Whoever loves them has loved me, and whoever hates them has hated me. Meaning al-Ḥasan and al-Ḥusayn (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhumā)." It was narrated by Aḥmad in "al-Musnad" (2/440) and in "al-Faḍāʾil" (2/777/1376) and through his route by al-Ḥākim (3/166) and al-Bazzār (3/227/2627) from Jaʿfar ibn Iyas from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Masʿūd from Abū Hurayrah who said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) came out to us with al-Ḥasan and al-Ḥusayn, one on his shoulder, and the other on his shoulder, kissing this one once and kissing that one once, until he reached us. A man said to him: O Messenger of Allāh! You love them. He said: and mentioned it. Al-Bazzār said: "We do not know that ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Masʿūd narrated from Abū Hurayrah except this." I said: Indeed, he has another ḥadīth from him mentioned earlier under number (360), but there it was recorded as "ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd" according to "Mawārid al-Ẓamʾān", and after the original printing of "Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān", and the printing of his teacher's book "Musnad Abī Yaʿlá", it became clear that the addition of "ʿAbd Allāh" between "ʿAbd al-Raḥmān" and "Masʿūd" was an error by the copyist or printer