and Abū Bakr al-Ṣiddīq with Ibn Mājah (3945). And ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar, in "al-Musnad" (2/111) and al-Bazzār (2/120/3342) from Nāfiʿ, and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ" (1/197/2/3608) from Sālim, both from him. And Anas ibn Mālik, also with al-Bazzār (3343) and Abū Yaʿlá (7/141/4107 and 151/4120) and also al-Ṭabarānī (1/158/2/2962) and Ibn ʿAdī (2/276). (Note on Matters): First: al-Nawawī included the ḥadīth in "Riyāḍ al-Ṣāliḥīn" (1055) from the narration of Muslim without the phrase: "for whoever seeks it..." etc., and with the objectionable addition found in the narration of al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī with others besides Muslim! I suspect that he copied it from "Sunan al-Bayhaqī" because he also attributed it to Muslim! Second: Ḥassān ʿAbd al-Manān did not notice what I mentioned in his new edition of "al-Riyāḍ," which can no longer be rightfully attributed to its author, Imām al-Nawawī, due to its distortion, altering its features by deletion, advancement, and delay, which would take too long to detail. I have clarified some of that in various places (1), and the point here is that the man claimed knowledge in his verification of this book, which reality shows is not as he claims; he is merely a transmitter without true verification, and this is the example before you. For despite the fact that he referred back to the ḥadīth in "Muslim" and placed its number beside it (632), he did not point out the discrepancy between it and its text in "Muslim," as if it does not concern him to annotate the ḥadīths of his "Riyāḍ" with their numbers in "al-Bukhārī."