in "al-Mukhtārah" (1683 and 1684), Abū Nuʿaym in "Akhbār Aṣbahān" (2/305), and al-Aṣbahānī in "al-Targhīb" (131/1) through the route of Ḥammād ibn Salamah from Thābit from Anas that the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: and he mentioned it. I said: And this isnād is authentic according to the conditions of Muslim.

- "Sit down, so that people do not say that Muḥammad goes to battle with a woman." Narrated by Ibn Saʿd (8/225-226): ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī Shaybah informed us, Ḥumayd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Rawwās narrated to us from Ḥasan ibn Ṣāliḥ from al-Aswad ibn Qays from Saʿīd ibn ʿAmr from Umm Kabshah, a woman from Quḍāʿah: that she sought permission from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) to go to battle with him? He said: No, so she said: O Messenger of Allāh, I treat the wounded and attend to the sick, so the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said:... the ḥadīth. I said: And this isnād is authentic according to the conditions of Muslim up to Umm Kabshah, but this Umm Kabshah was mentioned by Ibn Abī ʿĀṣim in "al-Waḥdān" (6/242) and al-Ṭabarānī through the route of Ibn Abī Shaybah as mentioned earlier under number (2740), with the ḥāfiẓ critiquing it for being mursal, and I mentioned a supporting narration that strengthens it. And indeed, the re-narration of it with the wording mentioned above was valued for the following benefit: I said: Regarding the acceptance of the report of "al-Waḥdān" from the Companions - who are those from whom only one of the Tābiʿīn narrated - there is a difference of opinion among the muḥaddithīn. The ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Iṣābah" (1/15): "Then, whoever's condition is not known except from his own statement, according to the words of al-Āmidī mentioned earlier and those who followed him, his companionship is not established. Abū al-Ḥasan ibn al-Qaṭṭān transmitted the disagreement on this, and he favored non-establishment, whereas Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr affirmed acceptance based on the presumption of his integrity