in his "Musnad," and the committee responsible for publishing "al-Jāmiʿ al-Kabīr" followed him, as is their custom, and all of this is incorrect because al-Ṭaḥāwī, may Allāh have mercy on him, does not have a book known by this name "al-Musnad." And Allāh knows best.

- "Name him with the most beloved names to me, Ḥamzah ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib." It was narrated by al-Ḥākim (3/196) through the route of Yaʿqūb ibn Ḥumayd ibn Kāṣib: Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah narrated to us from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār from Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh who said: A boy was born to a man among us, and they said: What shall we name him? The Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: and he mentioned it. And he said: "The isnād is authentic." Al-Dhahabī refuted it by saying: "I say: Yaʿqūb is weak." This is what he said, and the man is disputed as you see in "Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb," and it is summarized in "Taqrīb," where it says: "Truthful, but perhaps he made mistakes." Al-Dhahabī himself mentioned some of this disagreement in "al-Kāshif," and said: "Al-Bukhārī said: We have not seen except good (and in "al-Tahdhīb": he has always been good), he is originally truthful." Therefore, al-Dhahabī included him in his book: "Maʿrifat al-Ruwāt al-Mutakallam fīhim bimā lā Yūjib al-Radd" (p. 191) and symbolized him with (M), and I think it is a typographical error contrary to all the sources that translated him, including "al-Kāshif," where he was only symbolized with (ʿKh, Q). Then he was followed up, as al-Ḥākim also narrated it through the route of Yūsuf ibn Sulaymān al-Māzinī: Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah narrated to us from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār, who heard a man in Medina say: