ibn Judʿān, and al-Haythamī said in "al-Majmaʿ" (2/139): "There is a difference of opinion regarding using him as evidence, and he has been deemed trustworthy." I said: Thus, his ḥadīth can be used as supporting evidence, and for this reason, I considered this ḥadīth of his to be ḥasan because it has a corroborating report from ʿAlī (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu), whose narration was previously cited under number (237). As for Umm al-Ḥasan - who is al-Baṣrī - her name is (Khayrah), and she is trustworthy as mentioned in "Thiqāt Ibn Ḥibbān" (4/216). The statement of al-Ḥāfiẓ about her being "acceptable" is an unacceptable shortcoming, as a group of trustworthy narrators have reported from her, and she is a Tābiʿiyyah. ʿAdī ibn Abī ʿAdī is al-Kindī. Ibn Ḥibbān said in "Thiqāt al-Tābiʿīn" (5/270): "The name of Abū ʿAdī is Furwah, he narrates from his father, and it is said that he was a Companion. ʿĪsá ibn ʿĀṣim narrated from him. He died in the year one hundred and twenty-six." He is mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb." Abū Hammām al-Khārakī (originally: al-Khārijī, which is a scribal error) is named al-Ṣalt ibn Muḥammad, and he is trustworthy among the narrators of al-Bukhārī. He explicitly stated hearing from ʿAdī, so I do not know if this is preserved or not, as their treatment of his biography suggests he is later than this generation. Ibn Ḥibbān included him (8/324) among those who narrated from (the Followers of the Followers) and not from (their Followers)! And Allāh knows best.

- "Be with the afflicted one in humility to your Lord and in faith." It was recorded by al-Ṭaḥāwī in "Sharḥ Maʿānī al-Āthār" (2/379): ʿAlī ibn Zayd narrated to us, saying: Mūsá ibn Dāwūd narrated to us, saying: Yaʿqūb ibn Ibrāhīm narrated from Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd from Abū