"this is how it came in this ḥadīth: "Ṣafwān ibn Umayyah" attributed to his grandfather, and he is Ṣafwān ibn Yaʿlá ibn Umayyah, a man from the tribe of Tamīm." I said: and this is how it appears in the established text found with al-Ṭabarānī, who added: "from his father," and I suspect this addition is from some copyists due to its contradiction with other narrations, and because al-Ṭabarānī said after the ḥadīth: "and it was narrated by Mujāhid from ʿAṭāʾ from Ṣafwān ibn Yaʿlá from his father." I said: and this addition: "from his father" is confirmed in "the two Ṣaḥīḥs" and other sources from the chains of ʿAṭāʾ from Ṣafwān from his father. Thus, the isnād is connected, and the ḥadīth is authentic, and it is recorded in "Ṣaḥīḥ Abū Dāwūd" (1596 - 1599), but it does not explicitly mention the revelation of the verse * (And complete the ḥajj and ʿumrah for Allāh) * and it seems that the ḥadīth of the translation clarifies what was summarized in those chains. For this reason, the ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Fatḥ" (3 / 614): "I did not find in any of the narrations an explanation of what was revealed at that time from the Quran, and a group of scholars have used it as evidence that some of the revelation is not recited, but it was mentioned by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ" from another chain that what was revealed at that time was His saying: * (And complete the ḥajj and ʿumrah for Allāh) * and the indication of the desired meaning is the general command to complete, as it encompasses forms and attributes." And it seems he remained silent about the mursal nature in the isnād due to its connection in other chains, and because of the explanation I referred to, and Allāh knows best. (Benefit): He said in "al-Fatḥ" (3 / 394): "Ibn al-Munīr said in "the marginal notes": His saying: "and do" means: leave, because the intent is to clarify what the muḥrim should avoid, and a benefit is derived from it, which is that leaving is an action."