and Muḥammad ibn Yazīd, this is Abū Hishām al-Rifāʿī, who is considered weak by al-Bukhārī and others. As for the isnād, ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī disagreed with them and said: Muḥammad ibn Faḍīl narrated to us: al-Aʿmash narrated to us from Ḥabīb ibn Abī Thābit from Saʿīd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān with it as marfūʿ. He did not mention (Dhar) in his isnād. It was recorded by al-Ṭaḥāwī in "Mushkil al-Āthār" (1/398). And Ibn al-Madīnī is a trustworthy and reliable authority from the teachers of al-Bukhārī, so it appears that Ibn Abī Thābit is the one who omitted (Dhar) and practiced tadlīs, as evidenced by the following narration of Shuʿbah. It was also narrated by others than Ibn Faḍīl with tadlīs, as Ibn Abī Shaybah said in "al-Muṣannaf" (10/217): Asbāṭ narrated to us from al-Aʿmash from Ḥabīb ibn Abī Thābit from Saʿīd with it, except that he stopped it at Abū and did not raise it. Likewise, it was narrated by al-Bukhārī in "al-Adab al-Mufrad" (no. 719) from Ibn Abī Shaybah. It was contradicted in its stopping, as ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad said in "Zawāʾid" (5/123): Abū Mūsá Muḥammad ibn al-Muthanná narrated to me: Asbāṭ ibn Muḥammad al-Qurashī narrated it with it, except that he raised it and said: from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) he said: and mentioned it. With this isnād, it was also narrated by al-Nasāʾī (520/933). And Asbāṭ is a trustworthy narrator from the men of the two Shaykhs, so the isnād is authentic as marfūʿ and mawqūf except for the tadlīs of Ibn Abī Thābit and his omission of Dhar. However, Jarīr confirmed it and said: from al-Aʿmash from Ḥabīb from Dhar from Saʿīd with it, except that he did not raise it to the Prophet ﷺ, and stopped it at Abū. It was recorded by al-Nasāʾī (521/936) and through him by al-Ṭaḥāwī. In summary, the narrators differed in this ḥadīth of al-Aʿmash from Ḥabīb; some raised it, some stopped it, some mentioned (Dhar), and some did not mention him. However, upon examining our takhrīj, it becomes clear that most of them raised it and mentioned (Dhar)