"it has no basis from the ḥadīth of Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd." Al-Dhahabī said in "al-Mīzān": "Abard ibn Ashras, Ibn Khuzaymah said: A liar and fabricator." I said: Some of those with biases among the contemporaries have attempted to validate the status of this ḥadīth with this false wording and to weaken this authentic ḥadīth. I have clarified the fabrication of that in "Silsilat al-Aḥādīth al-Ḍaʿīfah" number (1035), and the purpose now is to complete the discussion on this authentic wording. It has become clear that the ḥadīth is firmly established without doubt, and therefore scholars, generation after generation, have continued to use it as evidence. Al-Ḥākim said at the beginning of his book "al-Mustadrak": "It is a major ḥadīth in the fundamentals." I do not know anyone who has criticized it, except for some whose singular opinions and anomalies are not considered, such as al-Kawtharī, who we previously mentioned for his excessive criticism and bias against the primary path of this ḥadīth, which does not include the previous addition: "all in the Fire," being ignorant or feigning ignorance of the ḥadīth of Muʿāwiyah and Anas despite its numerous chains from Anas, as you have seen. If only he had not limited himself to that, we would not have paid much attention to him. However, he supported his opinion by quoting some distinguished scholars, namely the eminent Ibn al-Wazīr al-Yamanī, and mentioned that he said in his book: "al-ʿAwāṣim