from Ibn Wahb: Sulaymān ibn Bilāl narrated to us from Sahl ibn Abī Ṣāliḥ from his father from Abū Hurayrah (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu) who said: ... and he mentioned it. al-Ḥākim said: "Authentic according to the criteria of Muslim." al-Dhahabī agreed with him. I said: it is only authentic, because its narrator from Ibn Wahb (al-Rabīʿ ibn Sulaymān) is not among Muslim's narrators, and he added two additions: one of them is "and His blessing" after saying: "with the praise of Allāh." This is also with Abū Dāwūd. The other is at the end of the ḥadīth: "he says this three times, and raises his voice with it." I said: both are anomalous as they are not found in most of the paths referred to from Ibn Wahb. It suffices as evidence that the authors of the "Ṣaḥīḥ": Muslim and Ibn Ḥibbān, as well as Ibn Khuzaymah, omitted them, for he presented in his "Ṣaḥīḥ" with two isnāds, from the mentioned path of Ibn Wahb, and from the path of ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir from Sahl ibn Abī Ṣāliḥ with it. Then he clarified that the two additions are not in the path of Ibn Wahb but in the path of ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir, then he said: "ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir is not according to our criteria in this book, but I included this from Sulaymān ibn Bilāl from Sahl ibn Abī Ṣāliḥ, so this was written beside it." I said: meaning that the ḥadīth came to him in this way by the narration of ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir coupled with the narration of Sulaymān ibn Bilāl, so he included it in the "Ṣaḥīḥ" as coupled, which is not a proof, but the proof is Sulaymān. And ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir is the weak Madanī. (Notes): The ḥadīth was criticized by the ḥāfiẓ Ibn ʿAmmār al-Shahīd in his book "ʿIlal Aḥādīth Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim," where he said (pp. 128-129) after weakening ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir: