it is likely that among this category is what is mentioned at the beginning of the biography of the elder in "Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb," where it is said: "Muslim narrated a ḥadīth about the multiplication of food at Umm Sulaym's, and the other in the saying of the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) to Anas: Seek me..." for it gives the impression that the other ḥadīth—the ḥadīth of the biography—was also narrated by Muslim, which is not the case. If it were not for the symbol at the beginning of the biography indicating that Muslim, al-Tirmidhī, and Ibn Mājah narrated it in "Tafsīr," it would be possible to attribute the phrase "and the other" to al-Tirmidhī. However, mentioning Ibn Mājah immediately after prevents this unless with apparent contrivance. Know that this ḥadīth was cited by Shaykh al-Sahsawānī al-Hindī in "Ṣiyānat al-Insān min Waswasat al-Shaykh Dihlān" (p. 353), using it as evidence that seeking intercession from the Prophet ﷺ during his lifetime is established. Then he presented the ḥadīths, this being the first of them, and after mentioning al-Tirmidhī's grading of it as good, he said: "I say: Its narrators are those of the authentic collections, and all are trustworthy except for Ḥarb ibn Maymūn Abū al-Khaṭṭāb, about whom there is a difference of opinion. Al-Dhahabī said in 'al-Mīzān'..." then he summarized his previous statement. His imitator, the author of the book "al-Tawassul ilá Ḥaqīqat al-Tawassul," understood from this that the ḥadīth is weak, and he said after the ḥadīth (p. 320 - second edition): "The ḥadīth is not authentic in its chain of transmission as will be explained." The explanation he promised does not go beyond his statement on the opposite page after also mentioning al-Tirmidhī's grading of it as good: