(Note): Al-Suyūṭī included the ḥadīth in "al-Jāmiʿ al-Kabīr" (6 - 14517) with the citation: "Q in (1), Kr from Ibn ʿAbbās." The committee commented on it: "There is a blank in the original in all copies." I say: It is known from al-Suyūṭī's introduction in "al-Jāmiʿ" while discussing his symbols, he says: "And for al-Bayhaqī (Q), if it is in 'al-Sunan' I leave it unspecified, otherwise I clarify it." The blank referred to, whether from the author—as it appears—or from the copyists, should correctly be: "al-Dalāʾil" as understood from the previous citation. This blank has been removed from some manuscripts of "al-Jāmiʿ" but the word (in) remains! The author of "Kanz al-ʿUmmāl" (11 / 456) followed this, but he removed (in)! Thus, the meaning became: ".. al-Bayhaqī in al-Sunan"! This is incorrect! After writing the above, I saw that Ibn al-Jazarī strengthened the ḥadīth in his unique book "al-Nashr fī al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr," where he said (2 / 391): "Ibn Abī Ḥātim narrated with a good isnād from Ibn ʿAbbās who said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said..." and he mentioned the ḥadīth.