if it is said: there is no blame on the Shīʿī for that, because he interpreted the symbol he saw in the book, and not everyone who quotes from a book is required to verify its texts and symbols. I say: this is true, but in the arrangement of symbols found in "al-Kanz," there is something that indicates to the scholar that there is a distortion without requiring any review. The symbol (hab, k, ḥal, ṣ) is neither sensible nor acceptable to the scholars, because (hab), symbolizing al-Bayhaqī, is a student of (k), symbolizing al-Ḥākim. How can the student be mentioned before his teacher? Especially when his teacher's book is considered among the "ṣaḥīḥ" works, unlike "Shuʿab al-Bayhaqī." And because (ṣ), symbolizing Saʿīd ibn Manṣūr, is the highest among all those symbolized, how can he be delayed behind them when he is ranked above them? But the correct symbol, as we mentioned, is (ḍ), which is a symbol for al-Ḍiyāʾ al-Maqdisī in "al-Mukhtārah." If the Shīʿī had knowledge of the biographies of the ḥadīth scholars, that would have been sufficient to protect him from this strange confusion. Furthermore, he interpreted (ʿ) as "Abū Yaʿlá in the Sunan"! Whereas it is Abū Yaʿlá in "al-Musnad," and even beginner students of knowledge know that Abū Yaʿlá does not have a "Kitāb al-Sunan." He has other oddities and wonders like his statement in a ḥadīth: "Whoever wants to look at Noah in his determination...": "It was narrated by al-Bayhaqī in his 'Ṣaḥīḥ,' and Imām Aḥmad in his 'Musnad'!" Al-Bayhaqī does not have a book called "al-Ṣaḥīḥ," nor did Imām Aḥmad narrate the ḥadīth in his "Musnad." Rather, it is a fabricated ḥadīth as I verified in the other book under number (4903), where I have listed many weak and fabricated ḥadīths that the mentioned Shīʿī used against the Ahl al-Sunnah regarding the guardianship and infallibility of ʿAlī (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu). Refer to numbers (4882 - 4907) and beyond, and you will see astonishing wonders. It will become clear to you that the man has no knowledge whatsoever of the science of ḥadīth, its narration, its authentic and weak reports, but rather he is a mere collector of random statements! (Another Note): The mentioned Shīʿī narrated the ḥadīth in the footnote of the book (p. 166) with the wording: "as you were fought over its revelation," altering the Prophet's (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) words: "I fought," to "you were fought," as a slur